Donate
Home
About the LRG
Patient Support
LRG Research
LRG Library
Medical Professionals
The Life Raft Group - Ensuring that no one has to face GIST alone The Life Raft Group - Ensuring that no one has to face GIST alone
My name is Dan. I love music of all sorts and playing the guitar. (Deceased 2/6/2009)
My name is Dan. I love music of all sorts and playing the guitar. (Deceased 2/6/2009)
The Life Raft Group - Ensuring that no one has to face GIST alone
About GIST
Frequent Topics
Accessing Treatment
Coping with Cancer

Doctors hear of Life Raft experience at London meet

More than 400 physicians attend symposium on Glivec therapy for GIST

The Life Raft Group’s profile in Europe skyrocketed this month when Executive Director Norman Scherzer spoke to more than 400 physicians from 32 countries at a three-day symposium, “Glivec: First Successful Systemic Treatment for GIST.”

The event was held Sept. 18-20 at the Hotel Intercontinental in London to further the understanding of changes in the management of patients with GIST in the era of Glivec.

Scherzer was the wrap-up speaker at the symposium’s first day with a presentation titled “Medicine on the Internet: Impact on Physician- Patient Relationships, the Experience of the Life Raft Group.”

Here are excerpts from Scherzer’s report which he filed Sept. 22. He cautions: “This is written to the best of my ability from my notes, and my recollections, while flying back from London. It is always possible that human error may be present, and I would ask you to treat my comments accordingly.”

“I was overwhelmed by the response to my presentation at the London GIST conference and by the acceptance both of my remarks and of the Life Raft Group,” Scherzer said. “Imagine my surprise when the opening and keynote speaker, Dr. Gordon McVie of the United Kingdom — whom I had never met before — remarked how delighted he was to have the Life Raft Group represented and how important he felt that we were to the proceedings.”

Given to all attendees was an abstract of his remarks and a paper, “Introducing the Life Raft Group,” which read:

 “The Life Raft Group is an international, Internet-based, nonprofit organization providing support to patients with GIST through education and innovative research.

“The paradigm for doctor-patient relationships is changing, and the challenge is how to shape these changes to benefit both doctors and patients. These relationships have been affected recently by managed care and by patient access to data on the Internet. This presentation reports on the evolution of a movement from patients accessing data on the Internet to patients creating data and then sharing it with others via the Internet.

“Within six months of the beginning of the Glivic (STI571) clinical trials in GIST, the headline, ‘Initial Survey Shows High Response Rate’ — appearing in the Life Raft Group’s monthly newsletter — introduced the first Internet-based report of drug response. Subsequent newsletters reported on the role of gender in side effects, continued to track rates of response to Glivec, and provided a comprehensive survey of side effects from the patient’s perspective. The result has been to turn the flow of clinical data upside down, with the patient now receiving information first.

“Patient perspective data have introduced a complementary way of looking at side effects, based on a unique measurement scale developed for patients, as opposed to the more traditional toxicity scales of the U.S. National Cancer Institute and cancer agencies in other countries. Data on the quality of medical care and the accuracy of patient reporting in clinical trials are also presented, with a clear correlation demonstrated between them.”

Tidbits Scherzer gleaned at the conference:
• Although gastrointestinal stromal tumor is a rare disease, and although no one actually knows how prevalent it is, the growing consensus is that it is more common than originally thought. Medical professionals guesstimate the annual incidence rate at 20 per million people, with an almost equal distribution of men and women, and with a median age in the 60s.
• Primary tumors are most likely to occur in the stomach (50+ percent), followed by the small intestine (30+ percent), followed by the colon/rectum (less than 10 percent).
• The history of the diagnosis of GIST is very recent, with the Japanese credited with finding c-kit in GIST in 1998 — the forerunner of c-kit testing which got underway, on a small scale, in clinical practice in early 2000. Prior to c-kit testing, the most common misdiagnosis of GIST was leiomyosarcoma, followed by leiomyoblastoma.
• Prognosis for recurrence: There was a consensus that the best predictors for the recurrence of GIST, following initial surgery, are tumor size and mitotic rate, although it was noted that GIST has a lower mitotic rate than other soft tissue sarcomas. About 70 percent of GIST displays spindled cells.
• About 95 percent or more are CD117 (c-kit) positive. That means that some GIST tumors are c-kit negative, although the diagnosis for GIST will continue to depend upon a positive c-kit test as the gold standard.
• Testing for c-kit is based upon using commercially available antibodies. There has been no systematic evaluation of the quality of these antibodies. A paper was presented comparing the reliability of several of the most common. DAKO was considered the best, followed closely by Novocostra. Santa Cruz and Neomarkers were considered much less reliable, producing an unacceptable number of false positives. What this all means is that accurate c-kit testing depends upon experienced pathologists using a reliable commercial antigen.
• Dr. Stephan Dirnhoffer of the University of Basel, Switzerland, in collaboration with Dr. Chris Corless of Oregon Health Sciences University, has produced the first GIST micro array (think of about 1,000 tissue samples on a single slide).
• Treatment response and genetic mutation: As reported at the May conference of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, there is a clear correlation between genetic mutation and response to Glivec, with mutation in exon 11, having the best response. “What I learned for the first time was that exon 9 — which has a poorer response to Glivec — has been found only in patients with a primary tumor in the small bowel or colon; and that exon 9 has not been found in any patients with a primary tumor in the stomach,” said Scherzer.
• There were no clear answers about the value of Glivec pre- and post-surgery, nor about the optimal dose, nor how long patients should remain on the drug. Of importance to many was the current treatment protocol being used at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston: Start patients at 400 mg per day, increasing to 600 mg per day as indicated.

There are a number of new trials for GIST patients using Glivec, with some at the meeting expressing concern that there may be too many for a relatively small number of patients. These trials include the neoadjuvant (before surgery) and adjuvant trials that Life Raft Group members have reported on, plus a new French trial run by the French sarcoma group.

Although the treatment with Glivec seems to be lasting for most, there is concern that remaining dormant cancer cells can produce recurrence with the cessation of treatment, and sometimes in the presence of treatment. The speculation is that this resistance to Glivec will grow over time.

The objective is to find ways to manage GIST in the interim and to find new treatments. There was a great deal of discussion, both in the formal sessions and in the many informal ones that followed, about the need for international collaboration to evaluate strategies for overcoming resistance, including working with the Life Raft Group whose daily discussions provide a sentinel system for reporting the incidence of resistance and any success in overcoming this.

There was also an emphasis on the need to obtain fresh tissue in such situations, particularly preand post-surgery. Once again the collaboration of the Life Raft Group, including the goal of creating a patient-driven tumor bank, was discussed.

“A developing consensus I walked away with was that patients who stop responding to Glivec should not be taken off the drug,” said Scherzer.

The consensus on how to take Glivec remains: Take Glivec with food, not because it is relevant to drug absorption, but because it may be helpful in avoiding certain gastric related side effects. Also, do not to take Glivec with grapefruit juice, because it may interfere with drug absorption.

Scherzer also met with about a dozen key clinicians and researchers outside the formal meeting to discuss collaborative efforts.

Also, Scherzer met with David Cook, United Kingdom Life Rafter, “who was kind enough to come down to London from Sheffield, England, to meet with me.”

Those with Microsoft Power Point software can get a copy of the slides Norman presented, and the Microsoft Word document, “Introducing the Life Raft Group,” by contacting him via e-mail at normanis@bellatlantic.net.

This website is accredited by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. We subscribe to the HONcode principles. Verify Here
This website is dedicated in perpetuity to the memory of Mary S. Golnik
JT IMAGES, Inc. - Website designer
© Copyright 2009 Life Raft Group. All rights Reserved.
Last Modified - November 22, 2011 1:38pm
View the Life Raft Group Policies and Disclaimer